Summer fires consumed 100,000 hectares more than officially stated

Paul Rees 19 March 2018

fireforest Portugal’s Institute of Nature Conservation and Forests (ICNF) downplayed the total area of land that had been consumed in last summer’s fires when the European Commission issued a figure of 560,000 hectares.

In 2017, the ICNF stated that 442,000 hectares had been consumed, a figure that has now been restated, showing Portugal’s assessment was far lower than the stark reality.

Portugal’s latest official statistics show that the 2017 fires consumed 100,000 additional hectares of territory than had first been stated. No explanation has been issued to explain the variance.

The new figure is based on satellite analysis in October last year, after all fires were out and the imagery could be studied with confidence.

The Ministry of Agriculture and the ICNF at least now agree that the European Commission's ‘European Forest Fire Information System’ was correct all along, although Portugal offers no explanation as to why the variance was so high and why it has taken until now to release the embarrassing update.

The reason is likely to be that the ICNF had not included those agricultural areas consumed by fire, totting up only black and charred forests, a theory advanced by technicians running the European Forest Fire Information System and met with silence from the ICNF.

Comments

0 #5 Jeff Brown 2018-03-20 11:03

ICNF alone is not to blame for this under reporting. TT amongst many others on the Expats sites have long questioned why the Portuguese Government were so adamant at a total from the 2 biggies of around 100 dead - when the 2017 Pedrogao Grande fire alone had nearly this number of charred corpses seen in mortuaries. Then, as in good old Salazar fashion - all hushed up.

0 #4 Ed 2018-03-19 20:14

Quoting Peter Booker:

So they were wrong, and do not care to admit it. I cannot visualise either 442 000 ha or 560 000 ha, so it really makes no difference to me or to Guido, but the new figure is roughly equivalent to half of Yorkshire. And I write as a southerner.

Six times the size of Lisbon (but smaller than Wales)

+2 #3 Peter Booker 2018-03-19 20:07

So they were wrong, and do not care to admit it. I cannot visualise either 442 000 ha or 560 000 ha, so it really makes no difference to me or to Guido, but the new figure is roughly equivalent to half of Yorkshire. And I write as a southerner.

0 #2 TT 2018-03-19 19:49

The fires also claimed many more lives than official figures admit to.
Compensation dodging? Face saving?

0 #1 Guido 2018-03-19 18:47

who cares you think ?

Refresh comments list

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.

JComments