fbpx
Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *

'On top of conflict and climate controls' - by Len Port

windfarmRecent events have been a reminder of Portugal’s laudable position well ahead of many other more powerful countries in at least two key areas of human endeavour: keeping the peace and controlling climate change.

The atrocities in London last weekend and Manchester last month made the latest Global Peace index all the more poignant and pertinent.

Collated by an international panel of experts and published by a Sydney-based think-tank, the 2017 Global Peace Index places Portugal among the fop five most peaceful countries in the world.

In this annual index – the 11th so far - Europe remains the world’s most peaceful region. Iceland, Austria and Denmark are together with Portugal in the top five individual countries. Four other countries in Europe are in the world’s top ten.

The index provides a comprehensive analysis on 26 indicators based mainly on levels of safety and security in society, internal and international conflict, as well as militarisation.

The latest index research pre-dated the Manchester and London attacks, but the peace levels in 21 of the 34 countries in Europe has statistically improved over the past decade.

The average has not changed significantly, however, due to a worsening of conflict in Turkey, the impact of the terrorist attacks in Belgium and France, and worsening relations between Russia and its Nordic neighbours.

More notably, the United States has plummeted to 114th place in the latest index. Based on a wide range of negative factors, the US is now slotted between Rwanda and El Salvador in the analysis of 163 countries representing 99.7 percent of the world’s population.

America's ranking has dropped 11 places since last year due to what researchers say is a “deterioration in intensity of organised internal conflict and level of perceived criminality in society”, both strongly linked to the ongoing political turmoil.

Coincidentally, the United States has been further humiliated on the world stage by President Trump who famously described global warming as “a Chinese hoax” and tweeted that “this very expensive bullshit has got to stop”.

Having now deemed the Paris climate agreement a pernicious threat to the US economy and American sovereignty, Trump has announced he is pulling out.

While criticising the shortcomings of other nations and promising “to make America great again” by revitalising America’s coal mining industry among other things, Trump seemed to overlook the fact that the US is the world’s second biggest carbon dioxide polluter nationally and the biggest on a per person basis.

“I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris,” declared the president at the end of a bombastic speech that was condemned by political leaders, scientists, environmentalists and corporate executives around the globe. It was also denounced by American Democrats, members of Trump’s own staff and a large majority of those polled on the subject in Pittsburgh itself.

President Trump expressed willingness to renegotiate the 2015 climate agreement to get a better deal for the US, but the leaders of France, Germany and Italy immediately issued a joint statement saying that the Paris accord was “irreversible” and could not be renegotiated.

Prime Minister António Costa is emphatic that Portugal is “totally committed” to the Paris agreement and has described global warming as “a challenge that does not allow further delays, because every day the threat is greater”. 

Portugal is already at the forefront of renewal energy production through hydro-electric, solar and wind resources. It is committed to an ambitious agenda with the aim of accomplishing the goals established in Strategy Europe 2020 and in the EU directive on renewable energies.

Prime Minister Costa pointed out in Morocco at the last major international climate conference that Portugal had already achieved “more than 87% of the goal set for 2020, after installing 12 300 megawatts of renewable technology, which represent 61% of the potency of all our electricity production”.

Former prime minister António Guterres, now secretary-general of the United Nations, said President Trump’s withdrawal decision was “a major disappointment”, but Guterres remains confident that “all other parties to the Paris agreement will continue to demonstrate vision and leadership, along with very many cities, states and businesses in the United States and around the world, by working for the low-carbon, resilient economic growth that will create quality jobs and markets for 21st century economic prosperity”.

 

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-76pzb4z0dl0/WTWHE1DDdhI/AAAAAAAAEb4/fEZQqkyABzYeyp1PsPl-U8WZ6fRulcR2QCLcB/s400/Conflict%2Band%2Bclimate%2Bimage.jpg

__________

'The Fatima Phenomenon – Divine Grace, Delusion or Pious Fraud?' by Len Port

An in-depth look at one of modern Christianity’s most intriguing series of events.

Available from Amazon

Fátima eBook in English

Pin It

Comments  

-3 #1 Denzil 2017-06-06 13:53
We have been here so recently. On the subject of peacefulness, a previous poster to ADN pointed out that it is not an achievement for Portugal to still be so be traumatised by its decades long dictatorship under Salazar and his followers. Perhaps the longest period of civic repression known to word history. A dictatorship so foul that thousands went missing, were found dead or returned damaged to their loved ones. Many not actual criminals, just trying to modernise this country !

Given the still endemic level of corruption today in so much Portuguese business and public sector activity and that so few were ever honoured publicly after the bad old days, for laying down their lives and sanity to get change for the better here in Portugal - is not in itself an achievement. Unless the bar is set so low as to be meaningless.

Just as meaningless as the Paris Climate agreement whose individual country targets were all self declared and self monitored. The US sportingly aiming for a measurable 25% reduction in its effluence. Not then aware that of the two other main offenders; China had agreed only to re-examine the situation in 2030 and India set no date or target - just agreed to pay carbon offset charges to itself! ©Denzil

You must be a registered user to make comments.
Please register here to post your comments.